« Hansen-Løve: Eden (2014) | Main | Nichols: Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966) »
Friday
Mar062015

Taylor-Johnson: Fifty Shades of Grey (2015)

Now that it’s become possible to witness virtually any sex act at the click of a button, there’s something improbable about the blank narrative time that once preoccupied so much pornography. In fact, it’s probably not an exaggeration to say that porn, as an old-fashioned narrative genre, has been more or less relegated to a boutique, arthouse niche – and even then a niche that’s filmed with the full assumption that you can still transition to the money shot at a moment’s notice. In the process, the ingredient that arguably accounted for porn’s eroticism – waiting, endlessly waiting – has been progressively whittled away, leaving scenarios that are ever more explicit, yet ever more mind-numbingly functional at the same time. In some ways,Fifty Shades of Grey speaks to that moment as eloquently as art porn spoke to the rise of digital streaming in the late 90s and early 00s, offering up a series of utterly unimaginative softcore scenarios that play out against an utterly lifeless neoliberal lifeworld, a world in which there is no real taboo left to surmount, least of all the sadomasochistic configurations that have been marketed as its most titillating and transgressive moments. That might sound fairly unpromising, but the peculiar genius of the film is that it makes you feel as if you can only really commune with Anastasia (Dakota Johnson) and Grey’s (Jamie Dornan) constrictive, suffocating rapport by watching it in real time. Rediscovering a certain masochism in simply watching pornography as film, the narrative revels in a sustained sense of the preposterous that only emerges when you watch it in its totality, and which seems neither unintentional nor knowing so much as wholeheartedly committed to the combination of the erotic and the idiotic – the erotidiotic – that once characterised porn as a genre, back when its artier and more masturbatory functions weren’t quite as separated and streamlined as they are today. Perhaps that’s why it often recalls Paul Verhoeven, since, like his greatest films, it forces you to be a hardcore voyeur for every minute of its two hour plus running time – a slightly ludicrous project, given that most of it looks like a tie commercial, a car commercial, or an Apple commercial, one of many ways in which Sam Taylor-Johnson’s mock-boutique style syncs perfectly with E.L. James’ corporate chic. Just as Grey brands everything in his life, so every single utterance exudes the mock-gravitas of his sex chamber, in something like an erotic thriller in which there is no actual thriller, which is perhaps what porn was all along. That said, from the film’s perspective porn is so historic that it’s already started to collapse into traditional romantic drama anyway, as Anastasia and Grey only seem to be able to finalise their masochistic contract by drawing upon one literary classic after another for inspiration - in a stroke of genius, Jennifer Ehle plays Anastasia's mother and muse -  which is where the film’s supreme sense of camp really comes into its own, its determination to pleasure as many viewers as humanly possible, even or especially if it risks ending up relegated to cult and covert midnight screenings in the process. 

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (1)

These are the notes I took after the film ;)

50 shades ideas

Men give women little now- he gives a lot
Actress was the best thing - perfect casting
Externalises the legalities that relationships now live under- the unwritten code
How untouchable men are now to the modern independent woman
She abandons her old life when she meets him- we see none of her work, her writing- power imbalance- she student, he CEO - typical
What if reversed stereotype and she was dominant- he submissive?
Her innocence- the destroying of Anna's purity by society- reference to Tess- what does he do to her
The ending is like a mini series ending
Doesn't work as porn or as a serious film
He was the villain in the fall - it could be reworked as that kind of thriller
The no touching thing more pronounced in book
He had more scars in book
Contrast between the aerial shots of open landscapes and the cloistered caged ness of the playroom
The house looked too bland
No depth of his relationship with family
Almost like the twilight family in the woods and she like the twilight actress
Would be good to see that little boy side with the older woman- could he act that?
Strange to see pubic hair on her too- retro

March 7, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterPip

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>